Dead space salvage final?

I enjoyed the book for its great story telling and its developing of characters. Though the setting/ story were kinda vague it did tell a good story with the characters in the book. I feel that the author of this book isn't trying to get anything across the reader other to be shocked. But I think this book is symbolic in a way. Because of how the characters are separated almost definitely into classes and how there's a psychotic religion that most likely raises the dead. I'll try to find more to back this up.

Dead Space Salvage

For this bog post I will be focusing on the main protagonist and the main antagonists in the story so a lot of the other characters will be left out. So our story begins with one of the protagonist turned antagonist Captain Benedykt Malyech of the black beak having a freakish nightmare, he is later woken up by his second in command Julia Copland. Then we are introduced to our true protagonist Stefan Schneider who is the second in command of Captain Jessica Li of the hunters moon. we can tell from both of these introductions that both Magpie crews both want the same thing; resources such as vanadium, platinum, etc. but they mention they are salvaging these elements under the governments nose so with that we are also introduced to our main antagonist Defense Secretary David Chang who is on a mission to find a missing ship known as the Ishimura for a great sum of money from the government. I personally think the author does a great job of developing these characters with their actions and somewhat their appearance. The Magpie crews look somewhat young but with the ragged futuristic clothing that anyone who would be doing illegal mining in space would wear. But the antagonist is a bit aging probably in his late 50's and has what looks to be very expensive government clothing and is very aggressive in the story. I'm guessing this set up of characters could very well symbolize something which I will try to find out soon.

1984 final

Diving into the book again after a while I still enjoyed this book. Though it isn't my favorite book to read, the author however doesn't cease to amaze me. I feel that his ideas have inspired a lot of the technology we have today like tv's, surveillance cameras, etc. Also I feel like he has written us a warning in 1984 as well. In today's society I feel that while we as humans are very intelligent, we are developing technology like computers and A.I. systems that are evolving in intelligence at a faster rate than humankind. I think George Orwell has warned us or at least he predicted in the book that technology is or will be growing at an alarming rate in the future so much that human kind would be drones to this technology and worship it as a god almost because of it's intelligence. That's why I feel George Orwell is an astonishing author.  

1984 George Orwell

I think George Orwell's message is pretty clear in 1984. To me I think that looking at today's technology and reading 1984 really shows how much this book has inspired much of the technology we have today. But that's not what I'm talking about. What I believe George Orwell is saying in 1984 is that technology is advancing and evolving at an alarming rate that one day the world will be run by machines. Or the other theory I had is that again that technology is evolving and advancing so much that in the wrong hands, the creations can be used for wiping out groups of people and bring a new world order. I'd say I'd go with my second theory because he wrote this book in the time of wwII and I can only assume he was inspired by mans condition at that time. And also that his other book Animal Farm talks about animales putting humans in farm pens, so it's kinda clear that he's interested in these kind of topics.

1984 mr charington

My character analysis on mr charington. To start off he's a minor character because of how little he shows up in the story. He's also an antagonist in the story due to him exposing Julia and Winston to the thought police. He is also a static character because again since he's shown for a short amount of time, so it's hard to expand on this character, and from what we have seen from this character we're just going to assume he will not change his mind and continue exposing people similar to Winston and Julia. He's a flat character for the same reason. Obviously an antagonist. And finally a symbolic character, why? Because I believe he represents betrayal and deceit. 

1984 q:3

I think the three rules of the government or the party in 1984 are because of crime rates rising in the book the government has made rules to where people are constantly watched and cannot leave their homes. I think the three rules they put out mean don't talk to anyone about us don't try to stop us or don't step out of line or you will be publicly shamed. 

M,A,A,N final blog post

I thought this book was great not as great as gatsby but great nonetheless. What was great about it was that it was written by Shakespeare. This being my first Shakespeare book it's very interesting how people talked back then and how the book is almost like a time machine of some sort. There's a lot of things you have to know about the past before you read a Shakespeare book and you have to be good at reading and understanding Shakespeareian which I was lacking in but the class helped out and so did the death metal I listen to. 

M,A,A,N comedy???

I think that the ending of this play proves that it a comedy because all of the characters in the story look back on their mistakes. What do I mean by that? What I mean is that all of the characters have either said or done something that they can all look back on and laugh. Because that's how older people work.  

M A A N: theme

I think the theme of this book is very vague and has more that one theme. What I mean is that there are a lot of emotions that the characters produce to make this story what it is. I believe that each character represents an emotion. Benedick and Beatrice represent love, don Jon represents deception and anger, Claudio and hero represent sadness until they get together, etc. that's why I believe the theme is very vague. Hope my sentences were good ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Balthazar

The Balthazar is a flat character in this story. How is he flat? In my mind I see a flat character as a character that has sides conversations with one of the main characters that don't move the story any further. And almost all of the things the Balthazar says go in the lines of "good evening!" "Would you like me to play a song?" (I don't know Shakespeareian so sue me!) and then just sings the songs and leaves. In a nutshell this is why the Balthazar is a flat character. 

Shakespeare 1

In act 1 of the pages 4 through 8 we see the flames of an argument rise between Benedick and Beatrice. When the argument is done Benedicks acquaintance Claudio speaks in good tongues about Beatrice, obviously dumbstruck by her looks. Benedick trying to make it sound like he knows about relationships tries to persuade Claudio that Beatrice is a lost cause and not worth getting to know. This to me and many others sounds like Benedick is really in love with Beatrice and is just trying to have her for himself later. I personally see this a lot in children's movies but I could be wrong. But if I'm not than this part is something we can go back to.